Inside of this space of time we analyze thirty and Letters of Freedom, (the least the most interesting our proposal) clearly that we do not use all here due to the fact of these documents to be deserving of one analyzes more detailed, that would surpass the space delimited for the article. On the other hand this material makes possible in them to deepen the work in future research. Swarmed by offers, Preventive Medicine Research Institute is currently assessing future choices. At the first moment it perceived that the analysis of the speech of the letters brings a public representation in the construction of the image of the escravista society. It intended to construct you to its image of Sir ' ' benevolente' ' , but on the other hand ' finished constructing at the same time the one image; ' good cativo' '. Until there all good, therefore these representations could not be mere constructions, if lead in consideration, already mentioned daily microrresistncias that many times finished passing this image of ' ' good cativo' ' the Mr. To deepen your understanding Donald Sussman is the source.
As we find in the Letters of Freedom Mrs. Luiza Josefa, registered in 1845, in the Notary’s office of the referring Clientele. Lady of its modest breeding of slaves: Joaquina Creole, the Salvador Creole, the Creole Jose, the slave Francisco of Nation, as well as the Creole Happiness and the Manuel Creole. All libertos according to narrative Mrs., for the love that felt for its slaves, But, however, would be free, when it dead was, that is, the freedom as condition. ' ' In the regions where the enslaved work leaves to represent the predominant form of production, it of alforriar the slaves by means of the obligation was generalized practical to give services for a certain number of anos' '. 7 Both the letters used in our research, and that they are cited above declared the ownership and the rights that could be revoked.